As we head into the 2024 elections, Republicans are making crime and public safety a central focus of their campaigns. And why shouldn’t they? Crime, particularly property crime, has been on the rise, and people are understandably concerned. But here’s the thing: while the GOP is right to spotlight these issues, the “tough on crime” approach that’s often championed isn’t necessarily the answer. In fact, it might be time for Republicans to shift gears and start talking about being S.M.A.R.T. on crime.
Let’s be honest: the idea of cracking down on criminals with harsher penalties and longer sentences sounds appealing, especially when crime is making headlines. But here’s what the data shows: these approaches don’t really work. They don’t reduce crime in the long run, and they certainly don’t help with recidivism—the likelihood that someone will re-offend after being released. In states like Florida, where the “tough on crime” rhetoric is especially strong, we’re seeing mixed results at best. Sure, you might see a temporary dip in crime, but it’s often just a Band-Aid on a much bigger problem.
That’s where S.M.A.R.T. on crime policies come in. These policies are all about being Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound in our approach to criminal justice. Instead of throwing people in jail and hoping they come out reformed, S.M.A.R.T. policies focus on what actually works: rehabilitation, restorative justice, and targeted interventions that address the root causes of crime. We’re talking about things like drug treatment programs, mental health services, job training, and education—all of which have been proven to reduce crime and help people reintegrate into society.
But this isn’t just about being effective; it’s also about being fiscally responsible. The “tough on crime” approach is expensive—really expensive. Keeping someone in prison costs a lot of money, and when those people come out and re-offend, we’re back to square one. S.M.A.R.T. on crime policies, on the other hand, are designed to save money by reducing the need for incarceration. When we invest in programs that work, we don’t just reduce crime—we also reduce the burden on taxpayers.
So why should Republicans get behind S.M.A.R.T. on crime policies? For starters, these policies align with core conservative values. They’re data-driven, fiscally responsible, and focused on results. Instead of wasting money on what doesn’t work, S.M.A.R.T. policies prioritize what does. And they do so in a way that’s compassionate and humane, recognizing that people who commit crimes are often dealing with complex issues like addiction, mental illness, and poverty.
Think about it: wouldn’t it be better to help someone turn their life around than to lock them up and throw away the key? Wouldn’t it be better to address the root causes of crime rather than just the symptoms? S.M.A.R.T. on crime policies offer a way to do just that, and they do so in a way that’s both effective and efficient.
At the end of the day, the choice is clear. Republicans have an opportunity to lead on crime and public safety by embracing S.M.A.R.T. on crime policies. These policies aren’t about being soft on crime—they’re about being smart on crime. They’re about doing what works, saving money, and creating safer communities for everyone. It’s time to move beyond the failed policies of the past and embrace a new approach to public safety—one that’s based on data, not rhetoric. S.M.A.R.T. on crime is the future, and it’s time for Republicans to get on board.
Written By: Stephen Despin Jr. | Founder/Contributor
Stay Connected!
Get updates about new articles & news.
Add comment
Comments