The Liberty Advocate

As this election season unfolds, it’s hard not to feel a pang of regret about the direction the Republican Party took. We had a real chance to turn the page, to present a new kind of conservatism, one that spoke to unity, optimism, and a forward-looking America. Instead, the party doubled down on Donald Trump—a figure who thrives on division and controversy. If we had chosen Nikki Haley as our nominee, we might be looking at a different landscape right now. Haley embodies everything that this moment demands: professionalism, composure, and an ability to bring people together in a way Trump simply cannot.

Leaving the Libertarian Party wasn’t an easy decision, especially after nearly a decade of being all in on its principles and candidates. But over time, it became clear that the party is its own worst enemy. Instead of focusing on the goal of advancing liberty, it’s constantly caught up in infighting, absurd theatrics, and a messaging strategy that’s more about shock value than winning hearts and minds. It started to feel more like a circus of internet trolls than a serious political movement.

The Free State Project (FSP) once held the imaginations of libertarians and small-government advocates alike. Its mission was bold: gather 20,000 libertarians in one state to create a living model of a society with minimal government intervention, maximal personal liberty, and free-market principles. They chose New Hampshire, a state known for its “Live Free or Die” motto, as their battleground for this experiment in self-governance. Yet, nearly two decades after its inception, the project stands as a cautionary tale of grand ideals meeting harsh realities.

If you’re still wondering why the Libertarian Party struggles to gain traction in mainstream politics, look no further than the latest controversy stirred up by its New Hampshire affiliate. The Libertarian Party of New Hampshire (LPNH) decided to wade into the political mud pit once again, tweeting a tasteless and highly inappropriate remark about Vice President Kamala Harris. This is not a simple matter of free speech or edgy commentary—it’s a glaring example of immaturity and unprofessionalism that only serves to further delegitimize a movement that should be standing for principled, adult debate.

The 2024 presidential election has taken an unexpected turn, leaving many on the right and left alike questioning the state of American conservatism. In an unprecedented wave of endorsements, Kamala Harris, once dismissed by many Republicans as the epitome of progressive overreach, has secured the support of some of the most prominent figures in conservative politics. This list reads like a who’s who of Republican royalty and right-leaning thinkers: Former Representative Liz Cheney, Former Vice President Dick Cheney, Former Representative Adam Kinzinger, Stephanie Grisham, Olivia Troye, Anthony Scaramucci, Former Georgia Lt. Governor Geoff Duncan, Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, seventeen former staff members of President Ronald Reagan, and now, the stalwart conservative columnist, George Will.

In an explosive twist, Rolling Stone recently unearthed a decades-old recording that’s turning the narrative of the War on Drugs on its head. The voice on the tape? None other than Richard Nixon, the man who single-handedly transformed America’s approach to drug policy in the 1970s. In this astonishing clip, Nixon casually admits that marijuana “isn’t particularly dangerous.” Let that sink in. The very president who declared a nationwide war on cannabis knew all along that the plant wasn’t the menace it was made out to be. And yet, he went on to make it a Schedule I drug, equating it with the likes of heroin and cocaine.

In the realm of local politics, few figures have managed to elicit the level of frustration and disenchantment that Callaway City Commissioner David Griggs has in recent years. For a man elected to serve at the pleasure of the citizens, Griggs has astonishingly little interest in actually listening to those he represents. He seems to have forgotten—or perhaps never understood—that his role is not that of an overlord, but of a public servant. Callaway deserves better. It’s time to call out Griggs for what he is: an obstructionist with a self-inflated sense of authority who has overstayed his welcome.

Callaway, Florida, is sitting on a goldmine of potential. With its gorgeous coastal views and close proximity to Panama City, it’s an ideal spot for both businesses and families. But instead of rushing into heavy-handed government tactics like so many places do, Callaway has a unique chance to grow the right way. By leaning into free-market principles, the city can encourage business development first and let the population growth happen naturally. It’s all about building a vibrant community step by step—without the need for big government or cozy deals with special interests.

In a move that reeks of cronyism, the Callaway City Commission has pushed forward a controversial change in land use for Tyndall Parkway, paving the way for high-density residential development in the heart of the city. Despite an outcry from the community, a handful of commissioners seem more interested in catering to developers than in representing the people who elected them. This blatant disregard for public input signals a dangerous trend in Callaway politics—one that demands immediate action to protect our community’s future.

Donald Trump went off the deep end in the recent presidential debate, throwing out a claim that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, are eating cats and residents’ pets. Yes, you read that correctly. Cat-eating. It’s not just an outrageous accusation; it’s a flat-out lie. And the most disturbing part? Some Republicans are still pushing this absurd narrative as if it’s the smoking gun of the immigration crisis. What happened to being the party of truth and responsibility? This fiasco is a new low for our side, and it’s time we called it what it is—nonsense.

Kamala Harris, now at the forefront of the Democratic Party as their 2024 presidential candidate, is attempting to paint a vision of progress and reform. Her campaign rhetoric is filled with promises of unity, economic prosperity, and justice for all. Yet, beneath the polished speeches and carefully crafted policy proposals lies a troubling record. Harris has made a career out of presenting herself as a champion of the people, yet her actions in public office often tell a different story. It’s time to peel back the layers of her platform and expose the glaring inconsistencies between her current promises and her past performance.

In a move sure to ignite celebration among 2nd Amendment advocates, Congressman Thomas Massie has introduced H.R. 9534, The National Constitutional Carry Act. This bill is nothing short of a game-changer, one that could reshape the landscape for gun owners across the country. By aiming to standardize concealed carry laws nationwide, Massie’s bill would allow law-abiding citizens to carry a concealed firearm in any state without having to jump through the hoops of varying state-level regulations. And let’s be honest—if you’re a strong supporter of the right to bear arms, this is the kind of legislation you’ve been waiting for.